Our glossary
The Paris Good Fashion glossary was born following the citizen consultation on responsible fashion carried out in 2020 at the initiative of our association alongside a collective of committed actors*.
It responds to the expectations expressed by more than 107,000 participants, concerning the need for consumer information and the need to use a common language understood by all. Hence, the members of Paris Good Fashion decided to develop this glossary in order to exchange and communicate on the same basis.
Initially published in French, this glossary is now available in English in order to make as many people as possible benefit from this work. It includes about 350 definitions, and is the result of collaborative work with our members**.
- We first defined the main categories and terms to be included. First, we defined the main categories and terms to be included: general terms of fashion and sustainable development, labels and certifications, actors and initiatives, and materials. Another category was established, that of "Basic concepts". It includes the most important generic terms of our sector. These are also often the most complex, as their scope is either very broad or unclear.
_ - Then, we carried out bibliographical research, which allowed us to carry out a state of the art of the existing definitions by basing them on the official and international definitions when they existed.
_ - When they did not exist, the terms were the subject of consultation and in-depth reflection by Sylvie Benard, Clémence Grisel and Isabelle Lefort in order to be enriched and as precise as possible. For each term, you will find the bibliographic references that helped establish its definition.
__ - Following this work which took place from March 2021 to February 2022, the definitions were submitted to the members for correction and validation. Special thanks go to Claudia Lee and Guy Morgan (Chanel), François Souchet (BPCM), and Andrée-Anne Lemieux (IFM) for their careful reading of the translation, coordinated by Clémence Grisel.
If you would like to know more, or have any suggestions, please contact us at contact@parisgoodfashion.com
* Eram Group, Etam Group, Galeries Lafayette, Petit Bateau, Vestiaire Collective, WSN
** They participated in the WG: Chantal Cabantous (Balmain), François Souchet (BPCM), Éric Dupont, Guy Morgan, Claudia Lee (Chanel), Christophe Bocquet and Aude Vergne (Chloé), Sylvain Cariou and Hugo Sereys (Crystalchain), Clémence Hulet and Alice Timmerman (Deloitte), Géraldine Vallejo, Yoann Regent and Annabelle Villot Malka (Kering), Frédéric Lecoq (Lacoste), Hélène Valade and Alexandre Capelli (LVMH), Thomas Bucaille and Pauline Mattioli (Petit Bateau) as well as Léonore Garnier (FHCM), Adeline Dargent (Syndicat de Paris de la Mode Féminine) and Andrée-Anne Lemieux (IFM)
References:
Fair for Life
Ecocert
Fair trade practices:
• Provide fair payment which enables producers to maintain a decent standard of living and promotes economic profitability;
• Respect fundamental human rights, including labour rights;
• Are environmentally responsible.
Find out more
There are numerous fair trade certifications and programmes, including Fairmined, World Fair Trade Organization, Fair for Life, Biopartenaire and Symbole des Producteurs Paysans. The Fairtrade mark is one of the best-known. First launched in the Netherlands for food products, it has since been extended to textiles, particularly cotton. The Fairtrade mark provides the consumer with the assurance that the producer has been paid a premium above market price.
Reference: Fairtrade
Reference: Fair Wear
Reference: Fairtrade
Reference: Fairtrade
Reference: Fashion for Good
The mission to create the Fashion Pact was mandated by President Emmanuel Macron in partnership with François-Henri Pinault, CEO of Kering. It was presented on August 26, 2019 to the Head of State at the G7 Summit in Biarritz.
Reference: Fashion Pact
Reference: Fashion Revolution
Find out more
Fast fashion first appeared in the late 1990s, spearheaded by Spanish group Inditex, the first company to accelerate the number of collections regularly arriving in stores (starting with one every three weeks), and Swedish group H&M who, wanting to “democratise” fashion and glamour, appropriated the codes of luxury brands (designs, famous models and photographers) and produced affordable versions of clothes that were otherwise inaccessible to most. Within a few years, both companies had opened giant flagship stores in the world’s leading capitals, attracting crowds of shoppers.
Other underlying factors in the rise of fast fashion were a far-reaching change in the fashion production model and the liberalisation of trade. China’s entry into the WTO and the abolition of quotas, which had regulated world trade in textiles and clothing products for three decades, enabled growth in fast fashion through a model of very low production costs (particularly in Asia).
Fast fashion is responsible for overproduction - the number of garments on the market increased by 60% worldwide between 2000 and 2014 - which leads to overconsumption and an explosion in the amount of textile waste.
Another consequence has been a significant decline in the textile industry in countries that were major historic producers but where labour costs are higher, in Europe and in particular France.
Fashion brands that have also adopted the fast fashion model have seen significant growth, with more and more collections, an increase in low-cost production and the opening of new markets in Asia (especially China for brands targeting the new middle class).
"Ultra fast fashion" refers to companies such as Primark (with dresses at £3.99) and Shein (considered the leading online fashion retailer), which adds 1,000 new items to its website every single day.
References:
International Labour Organization (1996) Globalization of the footwear, textiles and clothing industries
Les Echos (2004) L'Arrangement multifibres va disparaître à la fin de l'année
McKinsey (2016) Style that’s sustainable: A new fast-fashion formula
Korii (2021) Après la fast fashion, l'ultra fast fashion de Shein
Condé-Nast - The Sustainable Fashion Glossary
While faux fur fabrics address animal welfare concerns, they do generate other problems, particularly environmental as most are made from synthetic fibres such as acrylic, modacrylic and polyester, which are petroleum derivatives.
Life cycle assessments comparing the environmental impacts of faux fur and natural fur have so far proved inconclusive, as results vary depending on care, product lifespan and other variables such as sourcing and use.
Emerging alternatives to faux fur are based on bio-sourced polymers and recycled polyester.
Note that the terms “faux fur” and “eco-fur” are not permitted by law in many countries and should therefore be used with caution.
References:
Kering Standards
Condé Nast - The Sustainable Fashion Glossary
CE Delft (2013) Natural mink fur and faux fur products, an environmental comparison
DSS Management Consultants Inc. (2012) A Comparative Life Cycle Analysis: Natural Fur and Faux Fur
Reference: FHCM
The federation’s activity focuses on lobbying, economic intelligence, and skills and training. Its Eurovet subsidiary organises 16 trade shows corresponding to different markets within the sector.
Reference: Fédération de la Maille, de la Lingerie et du Balnéaire
The federation comprises eight regional syndicates covering the whole of France.
References:
Fédération Française du Prêt-à-porter Féminin
Crystalchain
References:
Fédération Nationale de l'Habillement
Crystalchain
Refashion defines final waste as any waste that cannot be reused or recycled, and which must be incinerated or go to landfill.
References:
French Environmental Code - Article L541-2-1
Refashion
See: Bio-feedstock, Second-generation bio-feedstock, Third-generation bio-feedstock, Fourth-generation bio-feedstock
Reference: Kering Standards
See: leather
References:
Condé Nast - The Sustainable Fashion Glossary
Atlantic leather
Fishskinlab
References:
FSC
Kering Standards
See: Bio-feedstock, First-generation bio-feedstock, Second-generation bio-feedstock, Third-generation bio-feedstock
Reference: Kering Standards
Reference: France Terre Textile
Fur production raises significant ethical questions regarding animal welfare: farming, trapping, transport and slaughter of the animals, as well as the use of endangered or exotic species and, for astrakhan, fetal and newborn animals. Unlike certain leathers, fur is rarely a by-product of the meat industry, hence its environmental impact is potentially greater.
Due to the complex nature of the value chain, traceability and animal welfare cannot always be guaranteed. Certifications such as WelFur and Saga ensure, to a certain extent, that the animals are humanely treated.
From an ethical point of view, faux fur offers an excellent alternative to natural fur. However, as most faux fur is made from synthetic materials and is generally less durable, it isn’t necessarily a more eco-friendly solution.
References:
European Commission (2001) The Welfare of Animals Kept for Fur Production
PETA (n.d.) These fashion companies and brands have banned fur
Paris Good Fashion