Our glossary
The Paris Good Fashion glossary was born following the citizen consultation on responsible fashion carried out in 2020 at the initiative of our association alongside a collective of committed actors*.
It responds to the expectations expressed by more than 107,000 participants, concerning the need for consumer information and the need to use a common language understood by all. Hence, the members of Paris Good Fashion decided to develop this glossary in order to exchange and communicate on the same basis.
Initially published in French, this glossary is now available in English in order to make as many people as possible benefit from this work. It includes about 350 definitions, and is the result of collaborative work with our members**.
- We first defined the main categories and terms to be included. First, we defined the main categories and terms to be included: general terms of fashion and sustainable development, labels and certifications, actors and initiatives, and materials. Another category was established, that of "Basic concepts". It includes the most important generic terms of our sector. These are also often the most complex, as their scope is either very broad or unclear.
_ - Then, we carried out bibliographical research, which allowed us to carry out a state of the art of the existing definitions by basing them on the official and international definitions when they existed.
_ - When they did not exist, the terms were the subject of consultation and in-depth reflection by Sylvie Benard, Clémence Grisel and Isabelle Lefort in order to be enriched and as precise as possible. For each term, you will find the bibliographic references that helped establish its definition.
__ - Following this work which took place from March 2021 to February 2022, the definitions were submitted to the members for correction and validation. Special thanks go to Claudia Lee and Guy Morgan (Chanel), François Souchet (BPCM), and Andrée-Anne Lemieux (IFM) for their careful reading of the translation, coordinated by Clémence Grisel.
If you would like to know more, or have any suggestions, please contact us at contact@parisgoodfashion.com
* Eram Group, Etam Group, Galeries Lafayette, Petit Bateau, Vestiaire Collective, WSN
** They participated in the WG: Chantal Cabantous (Balmain), François Souchet (BPCM), Éric Dupont, Guy Morgan, Claudia Lee (Chanel), Christophe Bocquet and Aude Vergne (Chloé), Sylvain Cariou and Hugo Sereys (Crystalchain), Clémence Hulet and Alice Timmerman (Deloitte), Géraldine Vallejo, Yoann Regent and Annabelle Villot Malka (Kering), Frédéric Lecoq (Lacoste), Hélène Valade and Alexandre Capelli (LVMH), Thomas Bucaille and Pauline Mattioli (Petit Bateau) as well as Léonore Garnier (FHCM), Adeline Dargent (Syndicat de Paris de la Mode Féminine) and Andrée-Anne Lemieux (IFM)
Reference: B Corp
The BCI program includes a set of standards and requirements for cotton producers, following seven principles: minimize harmful impacts of crop protection practices; promote water stewardship; care for health of the soil; enhance biodiversity and use land responsibly; care for and preserve fiber quality; promote decent work standards; and operate an effective management system.
The Better Cotton Initiative authorises the use of genetically modified seeds as well as chemical fertilisers and pesticides (at the same time encouraging more sustainable forms of crop protection).
It has been criticised for failing to adequately monitor improvement, for its weaker standards and (as a consequence) for taking significant market share from certifications that are harder to obtain, such as the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) or OEKO-TEX. Third-party reviewers have observed that Better Cotton standards need stronger criteria and closer producer monitoring if they are to match the ecological impact of organic alternatives.
References:
Better Cotton
Condenast - The Sustainable Fashion Glossary
Changing Markets Foundation (2018) The false promise of certification
International Trade Centre (2017) The State of Sustainable Markets 2017
Find out more
The Biobased Content Certification Scheme enables independent assessment of claims about the bio-based content of products, based on European standard EN 16785-1.
Reference:
European Commission
See: Bio-based
Reference: European Commission
See: First-generation bio-feedstock, Second-generation bio-feedstock, Third-generation bio-feedstock, Fourth-generation bio-feedstock
Reference: Kering Standards
Find out more
EN 13432 is widely considered as the reference standard for biodegradability. For biodegradable plastics to comply with this standard, they must meet several criteria:
• Composition (as per EN 13432): the initial material must contain a minimum of 50% of volatile solids and not exceed acceptable maximum levels of heavy metal and fluorine.
• Disintegration (as per ISO 16929): the capacity of a material to break down into small fragments through composting. The fraction of test material retained by a 2mm sieve must be less than 10% of the initial mass after 12 weeks.
• Biodegradability (as per ISO 14855:1999): the acceptable level of biodegradability is at least 90% in total or 90% of the maximum level of biodegradation of the reference substance in less than 6 months.
• Final compost quality and ecotoxicity (as per OECD 208): must not be modified by packaging materials added to the compost and must not be harmful to the environment. This guideline requires ecotoxicity tests to be performed on the final compost and that results are 90% better than for the corresponding control compost.
Other biodegradability standard: NF T 51-800 : 2015 - Specifications for plastics suitable for home composting.
References:
Vocabulaire de l'environnement - JORF n°0087
Natureplast
See also: OK Compost HOME and OK Compost INDUSTRIAL
Reference: European Directive (EU) 2019/904 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment
Reference: United Nations (1992) Convention on biological diversity
This profound economic transition involves the transformation of biomass, through advances in modern biology, into new products such as biofuel and green chemistry.
Find out more
Responding to what he believed was an overly mechanist liberal economy, in 1971 Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen published his seminal work in which he highlights the contradiction between finite natural resources and unlimited economic growth.
Reference: OECD (2009) The Bioeconomy to 2030: designing a policy agenda
Reference: BioFabricate and Fashion for Good (2020) Understanding Bio Material Innovations : a primer for the fashion industry
Reference: Larousse
Find out more
The biosphere comprises all the ecosystems and living organisms in:
• the hydrosphere (water on, under and above Earth’s surface)
• the lithosphere (the outer layer of Earth)
• the atmosphere (the layer of gas around Earth)
References:
IPCC (2018) Glossary
Actu Environnement
Reference: Wikipedia
The majority of currently available biopolymers are produced from first-generation bio-feedstock such as maize, sugar cane, sugar beet and vegetable oils which are grown as monocrops, depleting the soil and monopolising land to the detriment of food crops.
These negative impacts could be reduced by developing biosynthetic materials made from second-, third- and even fourth-generation bio-feedstocks, such as agricultural and sylvicultural waste (second-generation), algae, fungi and bacteria (third-generation) and carbon (fourth-generation).
See: Bio-feedstock, First-generation bio-feedstock, Second-generation bio-feedstock, Third-generation bio-feedstock, Fourth-generation bio-feedstock
References:
Kering Standards
Biofabricate and Fashion for Good (2021) Understanding "Bio" Material Innovations
Textile Exchange
Reference: OECD
Materials can be blended in various ways:
• Fibres are combined prior to spinning (intimate blending)
• Two threads with different components are combined into one
• Several yarns with different components are woven or knitted together.
Blended materials are currently difficult to recycle as the different fibres must first be identified and separated.
Reference: Refashion
Blockchain has developed in the fashion industry for traceability and transparency in the supply chain and to combat counterfeit materials and products.
Reference: ISO 22739:2020 Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies
References:
bluesign
Condenast - The Sustainable Fashion Glossary
International Trade Centre (2018) Standards map: bluesign
European Commission (2019) Support report mapping sustainable fashion opportunities for SMEs
Reference: British Fashion Council
Reference: Bureau Veritas
Reference: Positive Luxury